people:jane
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
people:jane [2013-11-09 15:13] – status quo jane | people:jane [2015-10-05 15:55] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | === Jane @ flossie2013 | + | ====== Jane ====== |
- | //a log of a remote participant and her coffee cup.// | + | I'm was born in Germany and lived and worked in Ireland before I followed the team of authors |
- | + | book and moved to Edinburgh. | |
- | ** challenge#0 ** | + | Here some of my past projects: |
- | Find and contribute | + | * [[http://www.edinburghcanalfestival.org.uk/ | raft race]] |
- | + | * [[http://vimeo.com/40813198 | |
- | * Discussed on IRC to branch of the [[http://flask.pocoo.org/ | + | * [[ http://studio.sketchpad.cc/sp/pad/view/ro.9tLnq9fG8256B/latest |
- | * Her coffee cup wispers that the discussion of "best practise" | + | * and critical |
- | * (maybe premature) Conclusion: Wait till the [[http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1223051718/ | + | |
- | * Checked recent submitted issues listed | + | |
- | * Coffee cup makes a jump as my mentor CorneliaB gives the go ahead. | + | |
- | * Conclusion: I have a contribution idea. Yeah!!! (But no coffee | + | |
- | **challenge# | + | |
- | Background | + | |
- | * How relevant is the issue? | + | |
- | * What is status quo of the communication between release team and maintainer? | + | |
- | * Overview of other communication strategies of other web frameworks | + | |
- | * What signal could we be used to measure that the new communication strategy succeeded | + | |
- | Implementation | + | |
- | * Learn and apply ideas from software projects where maintainer routinely response fast to critical | + | |
- | * Set the current strategy in a metrics with the proposed strategy | + | |
- | Review | + | |
- | * Summarize the outcome & praise the giants | + | |
- | + | ||
- | === How relevant is the issue? === | + | |
- | Relevants is depending on the person affected by the problem, in this case: the flask installation maintainer. Maybe even more specifically flask maintainer that are currently not regular making pull requests to flask project. For this reason is using the fork counter of on github maybe misleading. | + | |
- | + | ||
- | I assume here that the maintainer that would benefit most from an improved release process is not regularly involved in the software development process of flask. Therefor this maintainer should have an options to quantify the trust that an announced release is actually from the current release manager of flask. | + | |
- | + | ||
- | Thanks to mattupstate I have a figure how many [[https:// | + | |
- | A sign of good uptake of the new release would be indicated by a bigger number then the number of previous released. Maintainer perform a download and my tweet about flask and animate more people to try out the new version. On the other side is the number of download not equal with the number of installation. Some people might newer go further to installation or request a make a dublicate download request. A brief look at the state over time might indicate also if more download are performed after the current announcement made on the current mailing list. | + | |
- | The cup whispers that the stat displayed is to small for Jane's clumsy courser to get hold of but admires neither the less option to compare the uptake of the different version. | + | |
- | + | ||
- | === What is status quo of the communication between release team and maintainer? === | + | |
- | The release manager publishes the new version via https://pypi.python.org/ | + | |
- | In addition does the release manager | + | |
- | The point that the [[https:// | + | |
- | People that install flask for the first time are not part of the scope of the challenge so I won't go into that. //Coffee cup: you just don't want to talk about a scenario where the first package is tampered with. (Maybe I don't want to wear the tinfoil | + | |
- | The author and mitsuhiko agree that the web of trust isn't practical. | + | |
- | + | ||
- | === Review === | + | |
- | Following the solution suggested in [[https:// | + | |
- | The cup mumbles " | + | |
- | ---- | + | |
- | You find me also on [[http:// | + | |
+ | I'm on our IRC channel / | ||
+ | x Jane |
people/jane.1384010028.txt.gz · Last modified: 2015-10-05 15:55 (external edit)